That's the downside to passive 3D glasses. Best they can do is most projectors have to split the 3D images into two 2K images for each eye if it's a 4K projector. Even if Sony wanted to release it like that (they don't), the standard Hobbit-issue HFR projector can't do 4K 3D at any framerate. Timbutt2 wrote:So for the most part as long as most people can see it in 4K 60 fps and 3D you should get the understanding of why HFR benefits S3D so much.īut they can't. If the filmmaker is relying on high frame rates to create an immersive experience for the audience should go be an engineer and not a storyteller. Also, I hope 3D is on its way out.again.Īll I'm saying is excessively high frame rates do nothing to serve the plot of the movie. If the sometimes excellent James Cameron couldn't get high frame rates to work (read: serve the movie) then I don't see how a hack like Ang Lee could. His opinion on higher frame rates is just his opinion.and if everyone else doesn't agree, then we're not looking at a seachange event. See what I did there? He's notorious for that tedious Brokeback movie, but I stopped caring at that point.
"Life of Pi" was terrible, "Crouching Tiger" was meh and "Hulk" was.an abomination.
Robert Niessner wrote:I stopped reading when it got to the point where Lee said he required "three and a half stops" more light when his techie pointed out they were going effectively from lighting for ISO 800 to ISO 160 and that was 2 ⅓ stops.
0 kommentar(er)
